SENSICARDIAC vs Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Direct competitors — feature-level head-to-head below. Comparability 88/100 Comparability is an AI-graded 0–100 score of how directly these two tools compete — higher means a more apples-to-apples comparison.
SENSICARDIAC
by DIACOUSTIC MEDICAL (PTY)
VS
Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)
by Eko Devices

AI Verdict

Both SENSICARDIAC and Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) are FDA-cleared AI tools for heart murmur detection and classification, targeting similar medical specialties. SENSICARDIAC focuses on live diagnostic quality stethoscope streaming and integration with third-party stethoscopes, while EMAS is designed for the Eko stethoscope ecosystem and offers additional features like AFib detection with specific devices. The optimal choice depends on existing equipment, specific remote monitoring needs, and desired feature sets beyond core murmur analysis.

Choose SENSICARDIAC if…

Choose SENSICARDIAC if your practice already utilizes non-Eko electronic stethoscopes, such as the 3M Littmann 3200, and requires a cloud-based AI solution for live, diagnostic-quality stethoscope streaming and guided auscultation. This tool is ideal for physicians needing precise classification of murmurs into dangerous pathological (Class I) or innocent physiological (Class III) categories to reduce unnecessary referrals and enhance diagnostic confidence.

View SENSICARDIAC →

Choose Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) if…

Choose Eko Murmur Analysis Software if you are invested in the Eko digital stethoscope ecosystem and prioritize a mobile-app-centric workflow for heart murmur detection and clinical decision support. This solution is well-suited for users who benefit from recording, playback, and sharing capabilities, and may leverage optional ECG data analysis for a more comprehensive screening approach, with the flexibility of a free basic AI analysis option.

View Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) →

When choosing between SENSICARDIAC and Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS), physicians should consider their existing equipment and specific workflow needs. SENSICARDIAC, from DIACOUSTIC MEDICAL (PTY), is a cloud-based service designed to integrate with various electronic stethoscopes, such as the 3M Littmann® 3200. It excels at classifying murmurs as pathological or physiological, providing detailed cardiac reports and a guided auscultation process. This tool is best suited for practices that may already possess compatible electronic stethoscopes and are looking for a robust, AI-powered diagnostic aid for remote cardiac care and murmur screening.

In contrast, Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) is an FDA-cleared AI tool that integrates specifically with Eko digital stethoscopes (CORE 500, DUO, CORE). While basic AI analysis for murmur detection is free with the Eko App, full features and live streaming telehealth capabilities require paid subscriptions. EMAS differentiates innocent and structural heart murmurs and provides clinical decision support, making it ideal for physicians already invested in the Eko ecosystem or those seeking a comprehensive, integrated solution for heart and lung care with mobile app accessibility. The key practical difference lies in their hardware integration: SENSICARDIAC offers broader compatibility with existing electronic stethoscopes, while EMAS is tightly coupled with Eko’s proprietary devices.

Reviewed by Pouyan Golshani, MD — Interventional Radiologist

Quick Comparison

Feature SENSICARDIAC Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)
Pricing Contact for pricing Free for basic ai analysis with the eko app; paid subscriptions required for full features (eko+) and live streaming telehealth capabilities.
Deployment Cloud, Desktop (Windows) Cloud-based service, accessed via mobile application.
BAA Available Yes AI-estimated Unknown
FDA Status 1 AI-estimated 1 AI-estimated
HIPAA Yes AI-estimated Unknown

Head-to-Head

AI-generated assessment across six dimensions based on each tool's documented features and compliance posture. Grounded in public data — not a substitute for hands-on evaluation.

Usability

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Tool B offers a mobile-first approach with wireless Bluetooth connectivity and a free basic app, which generally translates to higher ease of use and accessibility for clinicians in various settings. While Tool A has a 'guided auscultation process,' its desktop deployment might be less flexible than Tool B's mobile application.

Clinical Value

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Both tools are FDA-cleared for murmur detection and differentiation. Tool B offers broader clinical utility by explicitly stating use for 'adult and pediatric patients' and the ability to analyze 'optional ECG data' in addition to heart sounds, providing a more comprehensive diagnostic picture. Tool A also classifies murmurs, but the multi-modal data analysis of Tool B is a key differentiator.

Pricing & Value

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Tool B provides significantly more transparent pricing, including a free tier for basic AI analysis, which offers immediate value and a low barrier to entry. Tool A's pricing is opaque, requiring direct contact, which can be a deterrent for potential users evaluating options. Tool B's tiered subscription model also allows users to scale features based on their needs.

Enterprise Readiness

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Both tools are HIPAA compliant and offer BAAs, essential for enterprise use. Tool B explicitly mentions 'EHR compatible' PDF report generation and has a dedicated 'Eko SENSORA Help Center' for enterprise institutions, indicating a more developed focus on enterprise integration and support. Tool A's desktop deployment offers an alternative, but EHR compatibility is crucial for modern healthcare systems.

Innovation

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

While both use AI for murmur detection, Tool B demonstrates greater innovation by integrating optional ECG data analysis and offering AFib detection with specific devices. This multi-modal approach and broader diagnostic capability extend beyond basic murmur classification, providing a more advanced and comprehensive cardiac screening solution.

Support & Docs

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

Tool B offers a significantly more robust support ecosystem, including a dedicated online help center with extensive FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and multiple direct contact options (email, phone, scheduled calls). Tool A primarily provides user manuals, which is less comprehensive for ongoing support.

Feature-by-Feature

Detail beyond the Quick Comparison summary. For pricing, deployment, BAA, FDA, and HIPAA see the Overview tab.

Feature SENSICARDIAC Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)
AI Functionality AI-powered heart murmur detection, classifies murmurs as pathological or physiological, aiding physicians in diagnosis. FDA-cleared AI for murmur detection, differentiates innocent and structural heart murmurs, provides clinical decision support for early detection of heart and lung disease.
Integration Integrates with electronic stethoscopes (e.g., 3M Littmannu00ae 3200). Integrates with Eko digital stethoscopes (CORE 500, DUO, CORE).
Key Output/Reports Detailed cardiac reports (downloadable PDFs, visualization, S1/S2 indicators). PDF report generation and sharing (EHR compatible); mobile app for recording, playback, annotation, and saving.
Target Patient Population Aids physicians in diagnosis; specialties include Pediatrics, implying coverage for pediatric patients. Detects and differentiates heart murmurs in adult and pediatric patients.
Live Streaming Capability Advanced remote cardiac care solution with LIVE diagnostic quality stethoscope streaming. Telehealth subscription required for live streaming heart sounds and ECG readings.

Videos

Demos, reviews, and walkthroughs featuring SENSICARDIAC and Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS).

Loading videos…
Videos need JavaScript to load. Search YouTube directly →

View all on YouTube

Frequently Asked Questions

Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) offers deeper EHR integration, allowing clinicians to open a dashboard within their EHR system for real-time transmission of cardiopulmonary data and single sign-on for telehealth sessions. Results, including AI analysis, can be pushed to the EHR via PDF or an anonymous URL, with specific integration capabilities for Epic using FHIR R4 connections. SENSICARDIAC provides downloadable PDF cardiac reports and is available as a stand-alone product or can be integrated with telehealth solutions, potentially through white-labeling for integrators, which may imply deeper integration options depending on the partner.
EMAS has demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 85.6% and specificity of 84.4% in detecting structural murmurs, improving to 90.2% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity for structural murmurs in adults. SENSICARDIAC, or a related Mobi version, reported a specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 84% for pediatric cardiac computer-aided auscultation relative to echocardiogram, classifying murmurs as dangerous pathological (Class I) or innocent physiological (Class III).
SENSICARDIAC emphasizes its role as an advanced remote cardiac care solution with live diagnostic quality stethoscope streaming, aiding in reducing unnecessary referrals, which could be particularly advantageous in telehealth, virtual care, and remote monitoring settings for initial screening and triage. EMAS, as part of Eko's broader platform, also supports telehealth and remote monitoring, and its AI is designed to aid in screening for cardiac murmurs potentially caused by valvular heart disease, making it valuable across various frontline clinical settings.
SENSICARDIAC features a guided auscultation process and has shown high usability scores in studies, suggesting a relatively low learning curve. Eko offers an 'Exam Flow' with step-by-step guidance and visual aids within its Eko+ software, and provides the 'Eko Academy' app as a free educational resource to help users strengthen auscultation skills and identify abnormalities.
While specific, detailed audit-trail features are not explicitly outlined for SENSICARDIAC in the provided information, its generation of detailed cardiac reports implies a record of analysis. For EMAS, the ability to record, save, and share reports within the Eko App inherently creates a traceable record of patient interactions and AI analyses. Eko's platform is HIPAA compliant and SOC2 certified, which generally necessitates robust audit controls to track user activity and data access for accountability and security.
SENSICARDIAC aims to provide immediate, accurate murmur screenings and reduce unnecessary referrals, leading to potential cost savings and enhanced urgent care, suggesting rapid clinical and operational value. EMAS offers AI analysis in seconds, enabling quicker detection of abnormalities and improved patient triage, with its EHR integration capabilities and global usage by hundreds of thousands of clinicians indicating readiness for multi-site deployments and standardized workflows.

More Comparisons

Assert-IQ vs Rapid Enterprise Platform
AISAP Cardio vs Rapid Enterprise Platform
AngioWaveNet vs Rapid Enterprise Platform
CorVista System with PH Add-On vs Rapid Enterprise Platform

More matchups featuring SENSICARDIAC or Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS)

AI Tool Finder
AI-powered search. Results may not be comprehensive.