AngioWaveNet vs Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST)
AI Verdict
Choose AngioWaveNet if…
Choose AngioWaveNet if your primary goal is to enhance the visual clarity and detail of fluoroscopic angiograms within your cardiac catheterization laboratory. This tool is ideal for improving the visualization of blood vessels and anatomical features during or after interventional procedures, integrating seamlessly with your existing angiography systems and workflows.
View AngioWaveNet →Choose Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) if…
Choose EFAST if your focus is on real-time, AI-assisted detection of structural murmurs and atrial fibrillation during routine patient auscultation. This software is best suited for clinicians seeking to augment their physical exams with immediate cardiac insights, leveraging Eko's digital stethoscopes for enhanced audio and streamlined documentation.
View Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) →Reviewed by Pouyan Golshani, MD — Interventional Radiologist
Quick Comparison
| Feature | AngioWaveNet | Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Pricing options include annual software licensing or subscription-based access, tailored to cath lab volume and hospital needs. custom packages are available. | Subscription-based, contact for details |
| Deployment | Cloud-based or on-premise/servers | Cloud-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) |
| FDA Status | 1 AI-estimated | 1 AI-estimated |
Feature-by-Feature
Detail beyond the Quick Comparison summary. For pricing, deployment, BAA, FDA, and HIPAA see the Overview tab.
| Feature | AngioWaveNet | Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) |
|---|---|---|
| Name | AngioWaveNet | Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) |
| Company | Angiowave Imaging | Eko Health |
| Description | FDA-cleared AI software that enhances fluoroscopic angiograms for improved vessel visualization in cardiac catheterization laboratories, integrating with existing Cath lab workflows. | Advanced, FDA-cleared AI model that assists clinicians in identifying structural murmurs associated with heart disease and detecting atrial fibrillation, providing real-time, actionable cardiac insights during routine exams. |
| Key Features | AI-powered Spatiotemporal Enhancement Processing (STEPu2122); Improved vessel visualization in fluoroscopic angiograms; Integrates with existing Cath lab workflows; Compatible with any fluoroscopic angiography system (vendor-agnostic); Post-processing AI for angiographic images; Enhances visibility of blood vessels, vascular structures, and anatomical features; Cloud-based or on-premise deployment options; Functions as a DICOM endpoint for imaging systems. | AI-powered structural murmur detection (93% sensitivity, 91% specificity); AI-powered atrial fibrillation (AFib) detection (95% sensitivity, 94% specificity); Real-time AI analysis during auscultation; Enhanced audio with noise cancellation and amplification; Waveform visualization and guided exams; Seamless integration with Eko digital stethoscopes (e.g., CORE 500); Cloud-based recording and secure storage of exams; EMR integration for streamlined documentation. |
| Categories | Cardiology AI, Radiology & Imaging AI | Cardiology AI |
| Specialties | Cardiology, Interventional Radiology, Vascular Surgery | Cardiology, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine |
Videos
Demos, reviews, and walkthroughs featuring AngioWaveNet and Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST).
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
More matchups featuring AngioWaveNet or Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST)
- AngioWaveNet vs EchoNext
- AngioWaveNet vs Cardiomo
- Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) vs Sleepiz One+
- Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) vs EchoNext
- Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) vs Cardiomo
- Eko Foundation Analysis Software with Transformers (EFAST) vs PMcardio
Backers
Who funded each tool's parent company.