Farzad Nazem

Solo Angel Palo Alto, CA, United States

About Farzad Nazem

Farzad Nazem is a former Yahoo CTO and a Palo Alto-based solo angel writing $100k-$250k checks at pre-seed and seed in medical devices and digital health, with no AI flag. The Hand Foundation website affiliation suggests current involvement in healthcare philanthropy, and his Yahoo-era operating credentials give him strong infrastructure-and-platform pattern recognition. Founders building medical devices with software and platform components, digital health with significant infrastructure or platform requirements, or companies where his senior-engineer-and-platform-operator credibility adds meaningful technical value are the natural fit. He is the wrong audience for biotech, consumer wellness without a platform angle, AI-heavy plays where the AI is the entire thesis, or anything requiring deep clinical domain expertise. The check size is meaningful for a pre-seed and a credible participant in a seed round. Outreach via LinkedIn is the primary channel; warm introductions through the Yahoo alumni network, Stanford engineering and computer science networks, or the Hand Foundation philanthropic community materially outperform cold notes. Without a Twitter or published personal thesis, founders should rely on his Hand Foundation context and Yahoo operating profile as the primary signal of taste. Best treated as a senior-engineer-credibility angel for the right device-and-software or platform-oriented healthcare founder.

Founder reviews

No founder reviews yet. Raised from this fund? Share your experience with other founders.
Portfolio data coming soon. Know their portfolio? Suggest an edit →
Team information coming soon. Know the partners? Suggest an edit →

Pitch / review this investor

Have you raised from Farzad Nazem? Founders only — share your honest experience (anonymous OK, moderated before publishing).

Share your experience
Last updated 2026-05-06. Sourced from this fund's published materials.
AI Tool Finder
AI-powered search. Results may not be comprehensive.